Introduction
Indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) are vital when head-to-head clinical trials are absent. Unadjusted comparisons are biased when trial populations differ in effect modifiers; thus, population adjustment is required. outstandR provides a unified framework for these methods.
Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison (MAIC)
MAIC is a method-of-moments weighting approach designed to match the aggregate characteristics of the comparator trial. Weights for each patient in the IPD trial are derived via a logistic regression formulation:
The parameters are found by minimizing a convex objective function to match target covariate means:
Outcome Regression Models
For an individual with outcome , treatment , and baseline covariates , the general outcome model is:
Parametric G-computation (Maximum Likelihood)
G-computation standardizes outcomes across treatment regimens. We estimate the marginal mean outcome by simulating a pseudo-population of size reflecting the target ALD trial, predicting outcomes, and averaging:
Parametric G-computation (Bayesian Inference)
Bayesian G-computation estimates the full posterior distribution of the model parameters, offering robust uncertainty quantification. For posterior samples , the marginal mean is computed as:
Multiple Imputation Marginalization (MIM)
MIM conceptualizes unobserved potential outcomes as a missing data problem. Using posterior draws, MIM imputes counterfactuals and utilizes modified Rubin’s rules to calculate total variance by subtracting within-imputation variance () from between-imputation variance ():
